Warning: include(domaintitles/domaintitle_wiki.exoticindiaart.php3): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/exotic/newexotic/header.php3 on line 761

Warning: include(): Failed opening 'domaintitles/domaintitle_wiki.exoticindiaart.php3' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/exotic/newexotic/header.php3 on line 761

Subscribe for Newsletters and Discounts
Be the first to receive our thoughtfully written
religious articles and product discounts.
Your interests (Optional)
This will help us make recommendations and send discounts and sale information at times.
By registering, you may receive account related information, our email newsletters and product updates, no more than twice a month. Please read our Privacy Policy for details.
.
By subscribing, you will receive our email newsletters and product updates, no more than twice a month. All emails will be sent by Exotic India using the email address info@exoticindia.com.

Please read our Privacy Policy for details.
|6
Sign In  |  Sign up
Your Cart (0)
Best Deals
Share our website with your friends.
Email this page to a friend
Books > History > East Meets West > The Blood Telegram: India’s Secret War in East Pakistan
Subscribe to our newsletter and discounts
The Blood Telegram: India’s Secret War in East Pakistan
The Blood Telegram: India’s Secret War in East Pakistan
Description
About the Book

In 1971, The pakistani army launched a devastating crackdown on what was then east pakistan. Killing thousands and sending ten million refugees fleeing into India. The events also sparked the 1971 indo-pakistani war.

Drawing on recently declassified documents, Unheard white house tapes, and meticulous investigative reporting. Gary bass gives us an unprecedented chronicle of the break-up of pakistan. And India’s role in it, This is a pathbreaking account of India’s real motives. The build-up to the war, and the secret decisions taken by Indira gandhi and her closest advisers.

This book is also the story of how two of the world’s great democracies-India and the united states-dealt with one of the most terrible humanitarian crises of the twentieth century. The united states’ embrace of the military dictatorship in islamabad would affect geopolitics for decades. The blood telegram is a revelatory and compelling work, Essential reading for anyone interested in the recent history of our region.

About the Author

Gary j. Bass is the author of freedom’s battle: the origins of humanitarian intervention and stay the hand of vengeance: the politics of war crimes tribunals. A former reporter for the economist, he has written often for the new york times, as well as writing for the new Yorker, Washington post. Los angeles times, New republic. Foreign affairs, and other publications.

Preface

Archer Blood, the United States’ consul general in Dacca, was a gentle-manly diplomat raised in Virginia, a World War II navy veteran in the upswing of a promising Foreign Service career after several tours over-seas. He was earnest and precise, known to some of his more unruly subordinates at the U.S. consulate as a good, conventional man.

He had come to like his posting to this impoverished, green, and swampy land. But outside of the consulate’s grimy offices, in the steamy heat, the city was dying. Night after night, Blood heard the gunshots. On the night of March 25, 1971, the Pakistan army had begun a relent- less crackdown on Bengalis, all across what was then East Pakistan and is today an independent Bangladesh. Untold thousands of people were shot, bombed, or burned to death in Dacca alone. Blood had spent that grim night on the roof of his official residence, watching as tracer bullets lit up the sky, listening to clattering machine guns and thumping tank guns. There were fires across the ramshackle city. He knew the people in the deathly darkness below. He liked them. Many of the civilians facing the bullets were professional colleagues; some were his friends.

It was, Blood and his staffers thought, their job to relay as much of this as they possibly could back to Washington. Witnessing one of the worst atrocities of the Cold War, Blood’s consulate documented in horrific detail the slaughter of Bengali civilians: an area the size of two dozen city blocks that had been razed by gunfire; two newspaper office buildings in ruins; thatch-roofed villages in flames; specific targeting of the Bengalis’ Hindu minority.

The U.S. consulate gave detailed accounts of the killings at Dacca University, ordinarily a leafy, handsome enclave. At the wrecked cam- pus, professors had been hauled from their homes to be gunned down. The provost of the Hindu dormitory, a respected scholar of English, was dragged out of his residence and shot in the neck. Blood listed six other faculty members “reliably reported killed by troops,” with several more possibly dead. One American who had visited the campus said that students had been “mowed down” in their rooms or as they fled, with a residence hall in flames and youths being machine-gunned.

“At least two mass graves on campus,” Blood cabled. “Stench terrible.” There were 148 corpses in one of these mass graves, according to the workmen forced to dig them. An official in the Dacca consulate estimated that at least five hundred students had been killed in the first two days of the crackdown, almost none of them fighting back. Blood reckoned that the rumored toll of a thousand dead at the university was “exaggerated, although nothing these days is inconceivable.” After the massacre, he reported that an American eyewitness had seen an empty army truck arriving to get rid of a “tightly packed pile of approximately twenty five corpses,” the last of many such batches of human remains.

This Was, Blood Knew, The Last Thing His Superiors in Washington wanted to hear. Pakistan was an ally-a military dictatorship, but fiercely anticommunist. Blood detailed how Pakistan was using U.S. weapons-tanks, jet fighters, gigantic troop transport airplanes, jeeps, guns, ammunition-to crush the Bengalis. In one of the awkward alignments of the Cold War, President Richard Nixon had lined up the democratic United States with this authoritarian government, while the despots in the Soviet Union found themselves standing behind democratic India.

Nixon and Henry Kissinger, the brilliant White House national security advisor, were driven not just by such Cold War calculations, but a starkly personal and emotional dislike of India and Indians. Nixon enjoyed his friendship with Pakistan’s military dictator, General Agha Muhammad Yahya Khan, known as Yahya, who was helping to set up the top secret opening to China. The White House did not want to be seen as doing anything that might hint at the breakup of Pakistan-no matter what was happening to civilians in the east wing of Pakistan.

The onslaught would continue for months. The Dacca consulate stubbornly kept up its reporting. But, Blood later recalled, his cables were met with “a deafening silence.” He was not allowed to protestto the Pakistani authorities. He ratcheted up his dispatches, sending in a blistering cable tagged “Selective Genocide,” urging his bosses to speak out against the atrocities being committed by the Pakistani military. The White House staff passed this up to Kissinger, who paid no heed. Then on April 6, two weeks into the slaughter, Blood and almost his entire consulate sent in a telegram formally declaring their “strong dissent”-a total repudiation of the policy that they were there to carry out. That cable-perhaps the most radical rejection of U.S. policy ever sent by its diplomats-blasted the United States for silence in the face of atrocities, for not denouncing the quashing of democ- racy, for showing “moral bankruptcy” in the face of what they bluntly called genocide.’

This Book is about How Two of the World’s Great Democracies-the United States and India-faced up to one of the most terrible humanitarian crises of the twentieth century. The slaughter in what is now Bangladesh stands as one of the cardinal moral challenges of recent history, although today it is far more familiar to South Asians than to Americans. It had a monumental impact on India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh-almost a sixth of humanity in 1971. In the dark annals of modern cruelty, it ranks as bloodier than Bosnia and by some accounts in the same rough league as Rwanda. It was a defining moment for both the United States and India, where their humane principles were put to the test.

For the United States, as Archer Blood understood, a small number of atrocities are so awful that they stand outside of the normal day-to-day flow of diplomacy: the Armenian genocide, the Holocaust, Cambodia, Bosnia, Rwanda. When we think of U.S. leaders failing the test of decency in such moments, we usually think of uncaring disengagement: Franklin Roosevelt fighting World War II without taking serious steps to try to rescue Jews from the Nazi dragnet, or Bill Clinton standing idly by during the Rwandan genocide.

But Pakistan’s slaughter of its Bengalis in 1971 is starkly different. Here the United States was allied with the killers. The White House was actively and knowingly supporting a murderous regime at many of the most crucial moments. There was no question about whether the United States should intervene; it was already intervening on behalf of a military dictatorship decimating its own people.

This stands as one of the worst moments of moral blindness in U.S. foreign policy. Pakistan’s crackdown on the Bengalis was not routine or small-scale killing, not something that could be dismissed as business as usual, but a colossal and systematic onslaught. Midway through the bloodshed, both the Central Intelligence Agency and the State Department conservatively estimated that about two hundred thousand-people had lost their lives. Many more would perish, cut down by Pakistani forces or dying in droves in miserable refugee camps. “The story of East Bengal will surely be written as one of the greatest nightmares of modern times,” declared Edward Kennedy, who led the outcry in the Senate. But in the depths of the Cold War, Nixon and Kissinger were unyielding in their support for Pakistan, making possible horrific crimes against humanity-plausibly even a genocide-in that country’s eastern wing.

The ongoing Bengali slaughter led within a few months to a major war between Pakistan and India. In that time, the White House had every opportunity to grasp how bad these atrocities were. There were sober misgivings voiced in the White House, and thunderous protests from the State Department and its emissaries in Delhi and Dacca, with Archer Blood the loudest voice of all. But throughout it all, from the outbreak of civil war to the Bengali massacres to Pakistan’s crushing defeat by the Indian military, Nixon and Kissinger, unfazed by detailed knowledge of the massacres, stood stoutly behind Pakistan.

As its most important international backer, the United States had great influence over Pakistan. But at almost every turning point in the crisis, Nixon and Kissinger failed to use that leverage to avert disaster. Before the shooting started, they consciously decided not to warn Pakistan’s military chiefs against using violence on their own population. They did not urge caution or impose conditions that might have discouraged the Pakistani military government from butchering its own citizenry. They did not threaten the loss of U.S. support or even sanctions if Pakistan took the wrong course. They allowed the army to sweep aside the results of Pakistan’s first truly free and fair democratic election, without even suggesting that the military strongmen try to work out a power-sharing deal with the Bengali leadership that had won the vote. They did not ask that Pakistan refrain from using US. Weaponry to slaughter civilians, even though that could have impeded the military’s rampage, and might have deterred the army. There was no public condemnation-nor even a private threat of it-from the president, the secretary of state, or other senior officials. The administration almost entirely contented itself with making gentle, token suggestions behind closed doors that Pakistan might lessen its brutality-and even that only after, months into the violence, it became clear that India was on the brink of attacking Pakistan.

This might give the impression of passivity, of a foreign policy on autopilot. Not so. Nixon and Kissinger actually drove their South Asia policies with gusto and impressive creativity-but only when silencing dissenters in the ranks, like Blood, or pursuing their hostility toward India. They found no appeal in India, neither out of ideological admiration for India’s flawed but functioning democracy, nor from a geo- political appreciation of the sheer size and importance of the Indian colossus. Instead, they denounced Indians individually and collectively, with an astonishingly personal and crude stream of vitriol. Alone in the Oval Office, these famous practitioners of dispassionate realpolitik were all too often propelled by emotion.

The slaughter happened at the same time that Nixon and Kissinger were planning their opening to China-a famous historic achievement that has a forgotten cost. Everyone remembers Nixon and Kissinger’s months of clandestine Chinese diplomacy, followed by the amazing spectacle of the presidential visit to Mao Zedong. But what has been lost is the human toll exacted for it in Bangladesh and India. Nixon and Kissinger needed a secret channel to China, which they found in the good offices of Yahya-an impeccably discreet tyrant on warm terms with both the United States and China. While the Pakistani government was crushing the Bengalis, it was also carrying covert messages back and forth from Washington to Beijing. Archer Blood sent off his dissent telegram just three months before Kissinger took his first secret trip to Beijing, flying direct from Pakistan, which sped him on his way with hospitality, an airplane, and a cloak-and-dagger cover story. Nixon and Kissinger, always sympathetic to the Pakistani junta, were not about to condemn it while it was making itself so useful. So the Bengalis became collateral damage for realigning the global balance of power. In the bargain, Nixon and Kissinger also turned their backs on India: the strategic opening to one Asian titan meant a closing to another. Indeed, one of the very first things that the United States did with its new relationship with Mao’s China was to secretly ask it to’ mobilize troops to threaten democratic India, in defense of Pakistan. It is absolutely right that the normalization of the American relationship with China stands as an epochal event, but those who justifiably want to celebrate it should not overlook what it meant for the Bengalis and Indians.

Contents

Prefacexi
South Asia, 1971xxv
1The Tilt3
2Cyclone Pakistan14
3Mrs. Gandhi36
4“Mute and Horrified Witnesses”49
5The Blood Telegram67
6The Inferno Next Door88
7“Don’t Squeeze Yahya”102
8Exodus119
9India Alone134
10The China Channel145
11The East Is Red160
12The Mukti Bahini178
13“The Hell with the Damn Congress”198
14Soviet Friends217
15Kennedy225
16“We Really Slobbered over the Old Witch”236
17The Guns of November258
18The Fourteen-Day War267
19“I Consider This Our Rhineland”289
Epilogue: Aftermaths325
Notes347
Acknowledgments479
Index481

Sample Pages





















The Blood Telegram: India’s Secret War in East Pakistan

Item Code:
NAH213
Cover:
Hardcover
Edition:
2013
Publisher:
ISBN:
9788184003703
Language:
English
Size:
9.5 inch X 6 inch
Pages:
526
Other Details:
Weight of the Book: 880 gms
Price:
$35.00
Discounted:
$26.25   Shipping Free
You Save:
$8.75 (25%)
Add to Wishlist
Send as e-card
Send as free online greeting card
The Blood Telegram: India’s Secret War in East Pakistan

Verify the characters on the left

From:
Edit     
You will be informed as and when your card is viewed. Please note that your card will be active in the system for 30 days.

Viewed 3246 times since 8th Jul, 2014
About the Book

In 1971, The pakistani army launched a devastating crackdown on what was then east pakistan. Killing thousands and sending ten million refugees fleeing into India. The events also sparked the 1971 indo-pakistani war.

Drawing on recently declassified documents, Unheard white house tapes, and meticulous investigative reporting. Gary bass gives us an unprecedented chronicle of the break-up of pakistan. And India’s role in it, This is a pathbreaking account of India’s real motives. The build-up to the war, and the secret decisions taken by Indira gandhi and her closest advisers.

This book is also the story of how two of the world’s great democracies-India and the united states-dealt with one of the most terrible humanitarian crises of the twentieth century. The united states’ embrace of the military dictatorship in islamabad would affect geopolitics for decades. The blood telegram is a revelatory and compelling work, Essential reading for anyone interested in the recent history of our region.

About the Author

Gary j. Bass is the author of freedom’s battle: the origins of humanitarian intervention and stay the hand of vengeance: the politics of war crimes tribunals. A former reporter for the economist, he has written often for the new york times, as well as writing for the new Yorker, Washington post. Los angeles times, New republic. Foreign affairs, and other publications.

Preface

Archer Blood, the United States’ consul general in Dacca, was a gentle-manly diplomat raised in Virginia, a World War II navy veteran in the upswing of a promising Foreign Service career after several tours over-seas. He was earnest and precise, known to some of his more unruly subordinates at the U.S. consulate as a good, conventional man.

He had come to like his posting to this impoverished, green, and swampy land. But outside of the consulate’s grimy offices, in the steamy heat, the city was dying. Night after night, Blood heard the gunshots. On the night of March 25, 1971, the Pakistan army had begun a relent- less crackdown on Bengalis, all across what was then East Pakistan and is today an independent Bangladesh. Untold thousands of people were shot, bombed, or burned to death in Dacca alone. Blood had spent that grim night on the roof of his official residence, watching as tracer bullets lit up the sky, listening to clattering machine guns and thumping tank guns. There were fires across the ramshackle city. He knew the people in the deathly darkness below. He liked them. Many of the civilians facing the bullets were professional colleagues; some were his friends.

It was, Blood and his staffers thought, their job to relay as much of this as they possibly could back to Washington. Witnessing one of the worst atrocities of the Cold War, Blood’s consulate documented in horrific detail the slaughter of Bengali civilians: an area the size of two dozen city blocks that had been razed by gunfire; two newspaper office buildings in ruins; thatch-roofed villages in flames; specific targeting of the Bengalis’ Hindu minority.

The U.S. consulate gave detailed accounts of the killings at Dacca University, ordinarily a leafy, handsome enclave. At the wrecked cam- pus, professors had been hauled from their homes to be gunned down. The provost of the Hindu dormitory, a respected scholar of English, was dragged out of his residence and shot in the neck. Blood listed six other faculty members “reliably reported killed by troops,” with several more possibly dead. One American who had visited the campus said that students had been “mowed down” in their rooms or as they fled, with a residence hall in flames and youths being machine-gunned.

“At least two mass graves on campus,” Blood cabled. “Stench terrible.” There were 148 corpses in one of these mass graves, according to the workmen forced to dig them. An official in the Dacca consulate estimated that at least five hundred students had been killed in the first two days of the crackdown, almost none of them fighting back. Blood reckoned that the rumored toll of a thousand dead at the university was “exaggerated, although nothing these days is inconceivable.” After the massacre, he reported that an American eyewitness had seen an empty army truck arriving to get rid of a “tightly packed pile of approximately twenty five corpses,” the last of many such batches of human remains.

This Was, Blood Knew, The Last Thing His Superiors in Washington wanted to hear. Pakistan was an ally-a military dictatorship, but fiercely anticommunist. Blood detailed how Pakistan was using U.S. weapons-tanks, jet fighters, gigantic troop transport airplanes, jeeps, guns, ammunition-to crush the Bengalis. In one of the awkward alignments of the Cold War, President Richard Nixon had lined up the democratic United States with this authoritarian government, while the despots in the Soviet Union found themselves standing behind democratic India.

Nixon and Henry Kissinger, the brilliant White House national security advisor, were driven not just by such Cold War calculations, but a starkly personal and emotional dislike of India and Indians. Nixon enjoyed his friendship with Pakistan’s military dictator, General Agha Muhammad Yahya Khan, known as Yahya, who was helping to set up the top secret opening to China. The White House did not want to be seen as doing anything that might hint at the breakup of Pakistan-no matter what was happening to civilians in the east wing of Pakistan.

The onslaught would continue for months. The Dacca consulate stubbornly kept up its reporting. But, Blood later recalled, his cables were met with “a deafening silence.” He was not allowed to protestto the Pakistani authorities. He ratcheted up his dispatches, sending in a blistering cable tagged “Selective Genocide,” urging his bosses to speak out against the atrocities being committed by the Pakistani military. The White House staff passed this up to Kissinger, who paid no heed. Then on April 6, two weeks into the slaughter, Blood and almost his entire consulate sent in a telegram formally declaring their “strong dissent”-a total repudiation of the policy that they were there to carry out. That cable-perhaps the most radical rejection of U.S. policy ever sent by its diplomats-blasted the United States for silence in the face of atrocities, for not denouncing the quashing of democ- racy, for showing “moral bankruptcy” in the face of what they bluntly called genocide.’

This Book is about How Two of the World’s Great Democracies-the United States and India-faced up to one of the most terrible humanitarian crises of the twentieth century. The slaughter in what is now Bangladesh stands as one of the cardinal moral challenges of recent history, although today it is far more familiar to South Asians than to Americans. It had a monumental impact on India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh-almost a sixth of humanity in 1971. In the dark annals of modern cruelty, it ranks as bloodier than Bosnia and by some accounts in the same rough league as Rwanda. It was a defining moment for both the United States and India, where their humane principles were put to the test.

For the United States, as Archer Blood understood, a small number of atrocities are so awful that they stand outside of the normal day-to-day flow of diplomacy: the Armenian genocide, the Holocaust, Cambodia, Bosnia, Rwanda. When we think of U.S. leaders failing the test of decency in such moments, we usually think of uncaring disengagement: Franklin Roosevelt fighting World War II without taking serious steps to try to rescue Jews from the Nazi dragnet, or Bill Clinton standing idly by during the Rwandan genocide.

But Pakistan’s slaughter of its Bengalis in 1971 is starkly different. Here the United States was allied with the killers. The White House was actively and knowingly supporting a murderous regime at many of the most crucial moments. There was no question about whether the United States should intervene; it was already intervening on behalf of a military dictatorship decimating its own people.

This stands as one of the worst moments of moral blindness in U.S. foreign policy. Pakistan’s crackdown on the Bengalis was not routine or small-scale killing, not something that could be dismissed as business as usual, but a colossal and systematic onslaught. Midway through the bloodshed, both the Central Intelligence Agency and the State Department conservatively estimated that about two hundred thousand-people had lost their lives. Many more would perish, cut down by Pakistani forces or dying in droves in miserable refugee camps. “The story of East Bengal will surely be written as one of the greatest nightmares of modern times,” declared Edward Kennedy, who led the outcry in the Senate. But in the depths of the Cold War, Nixon and Kissinger were unyielding in their support for Pakistan, making possible horrific crimes against humanity-plausibly even a genocide-in that country’s eastern wing.

The ongoing Bengali slaughter led within a few months to a major war between Pakistan and India. In that time, the White House had every opportunity to grasp how bad these atrocities were. There were sober misgivings voiced in the White House, and thunderous protests from the State Department and its emissaries in Delhi and Dacca, with Archer Blood the loudest voice of all. But throughout it all, from the outbreak of civil war to the Bengali massacres to Pakistan’s crushing defeat by the Indian military, Nixon and Kissinger, unfazed by detailed knowledge of the massacres, stood stoutly behind Pakistan.

As its most important international backer, the United States had great influence over Pakistan. But at almost every turning point in the crisis, Nixon and Kissinger failed to use that leverage to avert disaster. Before the shooting started, they consciously decided not to warn Pakistan’s military chiefs against using violence on their own population. They did not urge caution or impose conditions that might have discouraged the Pakistani military government from butchering its own citizenry. They did not threaten the loss of U.S. support or even sanctions if Pakistan took the wrong course. They allowed the army to sweep aside the results of Pakistan’s first truly free and fair democratic election, without even suggesting that the military strongmen try to work out a power-sharing deal with the Bengali leadership that had won the vote. They did not ask that Pakistan refrain from using US. Weaponry to slaughter civilians, even though that could have impeded the military’s rampage, and might have deterred the army. There was no public condemnation-nor even a private threat of it-from the president, the secretary of state, or other senior officials. The administration almost entirely contented itself with making gentle, token suggestions behind closed doors that Pakistan might lessen its brutality-and even that only after, months into the violence, it became clear that India was on the brink of attacking Pakistan.

This might give the impression of passivity, of a foreign policy on autopilot. Not so. Nixon and Kissinger actually drove their South Asia policies with gusto and impressive creativity-but only when silencing dissenters in the ranks, like Blood, or pursuing their hostility toward India. They found no appeal in India, neither out of ideological admiration for India’s flawed but functioning democracy, nor from a geo- political appreciation of the sheer size and importance of the Indian colossus. Instead, they denounced Indians individually and collectively, with an astonishingly personal and crude stream of vitriol. Alone in the Oval Office, these famous practitioners of dispassionate realpolitik were all too often propelled by emotion.

The slaughter happened at the same time that Nixon and Kissinger were planning their opening to China-a famous historic achievement that has a forgotten cost. Everyone remembers Nixon and Kissinger’s months of clandestine Chinese diplomacy, followed by the amazing spectacle of the presidential visit to Mao Zedong. But what has been lost is the human toll exacted for it in Bangladesh and India. Nixon and Kissinger needed a secret channel to China, which they found in the good offices of Yahya-an impeccably discreet tyrant on warm terms with both the United States and China. While the Pakistani government was crushing the Bengalis, it was also carrying covert messages back and forth from Washington to Beijing. Archer Blood sent off his dissent telegram just three months before Kissinger took his first secret trip to Beijing, flying direct from Pakistan, which sped him on his way with hospitality, an airplane, and a cloak-and-dagger cover story. Nixon and Kissinger, always sympathetic to the Pakistani junta, were not about to condemn it while it was making itself so useful. So the Bengalis became collateral damage for realigning the global balance of power. In the bargain, Nixon and Kissinger also turned their backs on India: the strategic opening to one Asian titan meant a closing to another. Indeed, one of the very first things that the United States did with its new relationship with Mao’s China was to secretly ask it to’ mobilize troops to threaten democratic India, in defense of Pakistan. It is absolutely right that the normalization of the American relationship with China stands as an epochal event, but those who justifiably want to celebrate it should not overlook what it meant for the Bengalis and Indians.

Contents

Prefacexi
South Asia, 1971xxv
1The Tilt3
2Cyclone Pakistan14
3Mrs. Gandhi36
4“Mute and Horrified Witnesses”49
5The Blood Telegram67
6The Inferno Next Door88
7“Don’t Squeeze Yahya”102
8Exodus119
9India Alone134
10The China Channel145
11The East Is Red160
12The Mukti Bahini178
13“The Hell with the Damn Congress”198
14Soviet Friends217
15Kennedy225
16“We Really Slobbered over the Old Witch”236
17The Guns of November258
18The Fourteen-Day War267
19“I Consider This Our Rhineland”289
Epilogue: Aftermaths325
Notes347
Acknowledgments479
Index481

Sample Pages





















Post a Comment
 
Post Review
Post a Query
For privacy concerns, please view our Privacy Policy
Based on your browsing history
Loading... Please wait

Items Related to The Blood Telegram: India’s Secret War in East Pakistan (History | Books)

The Birth of Bangladesh (Pakistan Splits )
by Lt. Col. J.R. Saigal
Hardcover (Edition: 2000)
Manas Publications
Item Code: NAJ548
$25.00$18.75
You save: $6.25 (25%)
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Sources of Indian Traditions: Modern India, Pakistan and Bangladesh
Paperback (Edition: 2014)
Penguin Books India Pvt. Ltd.
Item Code: NAJ941
$40.00$30.00
You save: $10.00 (25%)
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Shifting Body Politics (Gender, Nation, State in Pakistan)
Deal 20% Off
by Shahnaz Rouse
Hardcover (Edition: 2004)
Women Unlimited
Item Code: NAJ217
$15.00$9.00
You save: $6.00 (20 + 25%)
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Islam, Women and Violence in Kashmir: Between India and Pakistan
by Nyala Ali Khan
Paperback (Edition: 2009)
Tulika Books
Item Code: IHL475
$30.00$22.50
You save: $7.50 (25%)
SOLD
Wise Men of The East (Set of 6 Books)
Paperback (Edition: 2014)
Scholastic India Pvt. Ltd.
Item Code: NAK121
$60.00$45.00
You save: $15.00 (25%)
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Sheikh Mujibur Rahman (From Rebel to Founding Father)
Deal 20% Off
by Syed Badrul Ahsan
Hardcover (Edition: 2014)
Niyogi Books
Item Code: NAK383
$45.00$27.00
You save: $18.00 (20 + 25%)
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Kashmir:  A Tale of Partition (Set of 2 Volumes)
by M.G. Chitkara
Hardcover (Edition: 2002)
A.P.H. Publishing Corporation
Item Code: NAK486
$125.00$93.75
You save: $31.25 (25%)
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Eagles Over Bangladesh (The Indian Air Force In The 1971 Liberation War)
Item Code: NAG455
$30.00$22.50
You save: $7.50 (25%)
Add to Cart
Buy Now
The Kashmir Dispute 1947-2012 (Set of 2 Volumes)
by A.G. Noorani
Hardcover (Edition: 2013)
Tulika Books
Item Code: NAF576
$90.00$67.50
You save: $22.50 (25%)
Add to Cart
Buy Now
The Future of Secularism
Item Code: IDI669
$39.50$29.62
You save: $9.88 (25%)
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Gender, Language, and Learning (Essays in Indo-Muslim Cultural History)
by Gail Minault
Hardcover (Edition: 2009)
Permanent Black
Item Code: NAI017
$45.00$33.75
You save: $11.25 (25%)
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Goodbye Shahzadi (A Political Biography of Benazir Bhutto)
by Shyam Bhatia
Hardcover (Edition: 2008)
Lotus Collection Roli Books
Item Code: IDK422
$26.00$19.50
You save: $6.50 (25%)
Add to Cart
Buy Now
A Cultural History of India
Item Code: IDF960
$30.00$22.50
You save: $7.50 (25%)
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Testimonials
appreciate being able to get this hard to find book from this great company Exotic India.
Mohan, USA
Both Om bracelets are amazing. Thanks again !!!
Fotis, Greece
Thank you for your wonderful website.
Jan, USA
Awesome collection! Certainly will recommend this site to friends and relatives. Appreciate quick delivery.
Sunil, UAE
Thank you so much, I'm honoured and grateful to receive such a beautiful piece of art of Lakshmi. Please congratulate the artist for his incredible artwork. Looking forward to receiving her on Haida Gwaii, Canada. I live on an island, surrounded by water, and feel Lakshmi's present all around me.
Kiki, Canada
Nice package, same as in Picture very clean written and understandable, I just want to say Thank you Exotic India Jai Hind.
Jeewan, USA
I received my order today. When I opened the FedEx packet, I did not expect to find such a perfectly wrapped package. The book has arrived in pristine condition and I am very impressed by your excellent customer service. It was my pleasure doing business with you and I look forward to many more transactions with your company. Again, many thanks for your fantastic customer service! Keep up the good work.
Sherry, Canada
I received the package today... Wonderfully wrapped and packaged (beautiful statue)! Please thank all involved for everything they do! I deeply appreciate everyone's efforts!
Frances, USA
I have always been delighted with your excellent service and variety of items.
James, USA
I've been happy with prior purchases from this site!
Priya, USA
Language:
Currency:
All rights reserved. Copyright 2019 © Exotic India