Warning: include(domaintitles/domaintitle_wiki.exoticindiaart.php3): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/exotic/newexotic/header.php3 on line 751

Warning: include(): Failed opening 'domaintitles/domaintitle_wiki.exoticindiaart.php3' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/exotic/newexotic/header.php3 on line 751

Subscribe for Newsletters and Discounts
Be the first to receive our thoughtfully written
religious articles and product discounts.
Your interests (Optional)
This will help us make recommendations and send discounts and sale information at times.
By registering, you may receive account related information, our email newsletters and product updates, no more than twice a month. Please read our Privacy Policy for details.
.
By subscribing, you will receive our email newsletters and product updates, no more than twice a month. All emails will be sent by Exotic India using the email address info@exoticindia.com.

Please read our Privacy Policy for details.
|6
Sign In  |  Sign up
Your Cart (0)
Best Deals
Share our website with your friends.
Email this page to a friend
Books > Philosophy > Philosophers > Towards a Critique of Cultural Reason
Subscribe to our newsletter and discounts
Towards a Critique of Cultural Reason
Pages from the book
Towards a Critique of Cultural Reason
Look Inside the Book
Description

 

From the Jacket:

 

 

Towards A Critique of Cultural Reason, is sequel to the author's Innovative Competence and Social Change and a prelude to his The Primacy of the Political, seeks to develop a Kantian perspective on the theory of culture, based on the notion of the regulative judgement and the idea of an exemplar in Kant's Critique of Judgement. After a brief critical discussion of the Marxist view of the relation between culture and politics, the author develops a theory of discourse which he believes would enable us to understand how meanings may transcend contextuality and function as exemplars having a symbolic rather than merely a significational context. These exemplary unites of meaning, which may be called symbols of transcendence, constitute the fabric of culture, which in terms of its context-transcending role, may serve as sources of validation for similar exemplary actions. The book then moves on to a study of the inter-relationship between meaning and action. In the concluding portion the author seeks to develop some suggestions towards a hermeneutical understanding of culture and politics. As elements of the overall discussion, the book also deals with such themes as the Kantian notion of Critique, Dilthey's project of a Hermeneutics of Historical Reason, Ricoeur's perspective on speech and textual discourse and Husserl's reflections on the life-world.

 

Preface

 

The present work is a continuation, on the theoretical plane, of my earlier work Innovative Competence and Social Change (University of Pune, Poona, 1986). The earlier work had ended with the issue of a proper theoretical framework for understanding the relationship between Culture and Politics. It is precisely with this problem that the present work begins. A Accordingly, the first part, Culture and Politics: Some Problems jar Marxism raises certain serious philosophical issues regarding theory and praxis. It is suggested that we may have to distinguish three forms of this interrelationship, namely, (1) Theory of Action, (2) Theory for Action, and (3) Theory in Action. The first, ‘Theory of Action’, is the context of methodology while the second, ‘Theory for Action’, is the domain of discussions of strategy and tactics. While these two forms of interrelationship between theory and practice have been widely studied, the third, namely, ‘Theory in Action’, is a relatively neglected area of inquiry. Hence, the first part concentrates on this idea of meanings and principles (theory) as constituting practice. This idea is developed in the form of a theory of communicative practices (against the backdrop of the theory of speech acts). The essential feature of the theory is the distinction between two levels of the communicative process- signification and symbolization. Basing myself on the work of Paul Ricoeur and others in general hermeneutic theory, I distinguish signification as the expression of contextualized and situation- specific meanings, from symbolization as the ‘moment’ within the process of communication itself as the transcendence of such contextuality. Accordingly, the discussion turns upon the possibility and modes of such transcendence. Signification and Symbolization are here understood as two levels of the semiotic process and their differentiation in terms of subject, addressee and reference are worked out.

A Using the theory of symbolic transcendence suggested in the first part, the investigation takes a transcendental turn in the second part—The Analytic of Cultural Reason. The inquiry is transcendental in the sense that it asks for the grounds of possibility of a certain given phenomenon, namely, that human subjects are capable of expressing themselves at both the signific and symbolic levels. The fact that meanings are communicated at both the levels is shown to be essential for the possibility of culture and hence the transcendental inquiry, at this stage, shapes itself as a Critique of Cultural Reason, patterned after the Kantian Critical Programme. Kantian Critique, as is well known, has two major parts—the Analytic and the Dialectic.1n general the Analytic is a positive argumentation whose objective is to work out a conceptual framework within which alone the phenomenon under consideration becomes intelligible. In the present case the quaestio facti from which we start is that men are capable of expressing meanings at both the signific and symbolic levels, i.e. that men interpret themselves and their experiences in terms of culture. The questio juris, in this case, is to derive the framework of categorial principles in terms of which such cultural understandings may be made intelligible. Using the model of the critical project, we may call this the transcendental deduction of cultural reason. Of course, the project of a transcendental deduction of cultural reason in all its complexity is not attempted here rather, Part only attempts what may be called a prolegomenon to such a transcendental deduction of culture, In this prolegomenon, the theoretical framework of Kant’s own Critique of judgement is used as a point of departure. Part 2 describes two modes of transcendence of situationality, firstly at the level of meanings and secondly at the level of actions——these two modes of transcendence are cal- led respectively, exemplars of meaning and exemplars of action. The interrelationship of these two types of exemplars is studied with the hope that such an investigation may provide a Kantian framework for the discussion of culture and politics with which the project started.

Part 3, The Dialectic of Cultural Reason, continues the critical programme in so far as it works out the antinomies of culture theory in the form of Kantian dialectics. The general principles of a Kantain dialectic are formulated and then applied to the specific case of culture. Also, the previously formulated distinction between signification and symbolization is used as the framework for a consideration of the relativistic and universalistic understandings of culture. The problematic of cultural relativism is articulated within this framework and is also shown how the basic notions developed in the course of the earlier discussion, namely, exemplary meanings and exemplary comprehension, may help us to overcome the limitations of relativism. Part 3, therefore, fulfills two functions: (1) on the meta-level, it situates the debate over cultural relativism in anthropological theory within a transcendental framework, thereby serving to reconcile the antithetic claims.

The salience of critical philosophy for anthropological theory, which was the presupposition of Part 3, therefore, fulfills two functions: (1) on the meta-level, it extends the project of a Critique of Cultural Reason and (2) on the substantive level, it situates the debate over cultural relativism in anthropological theory within a transcendental framework, thereby serving to reconcile the antithetic claims.

The salience of critical philosophy for anthropological theory, which was the presupposition of Part 3, becomes the focus of attention in Part 4, Anthropology, Philosophy and Critique of Cultural Reason. 'this part has two major concerns: on the one hand, the notion of symbolic transcendence, which has been the moving principle of the hermeneutic programme of the present project, needs to be examined in the light of the philosophical understanding of transcendence. Accordingly, section l of the present part, entitled Transcendence and Hermeneutics, reviews the emergence of the Kantian programme of finite transcendence against the metaphysical theories of transcendence in Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz. If section l is concerned with the formation of Critique in the context of Pre—Kantian thought, section 2 on Critique, Hermeneutics and Politics seeks to place the critical programme in the context of the development of post-Kantian thought. Here an attempt is made to link together hermeneutics and transcendental critique in the form of a discussion of Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Husserl and Heidegger. The discussion gravitates towards Heidegger’s Kant-interpretation in the form of a fundamental ontology. But what perhaps marks off the present investigation from that of Heidegger are (i) unlike Heidegger’s Kant and the Problem of (Metaphysics, the present essay is more closely tuned to Kant’s Critique of judgement, (ii) it seeks to provide a transcendental grounding for a theory of politics. Indeed, this last theme is the concern of section 2 and thus the project comes back to its basic problematic-the understanding of the relationship between culture and politics. A number of friends, students, research scholars and colleagues have helped me greatly in ways more numerous than I can mention in the course of the present work. I wish to express my appreciation and thanks for their help and concern with my work. But there are others who have helped me more specifically during distinct stages of the present investigations. Of these, I would like to mention Dr Probal Dasgupta (Deccan College, Pune), Dr Ashok Kelkar (Deccan College, Pune), Professor Ram Bapat (Department of Politics, University of Poona, Pune), Dr Dharmendra Goel and Dr (Miss) Bhuvan Chandel (Department of Philosophy, Panjab University, Chandigarh) and finally Professor Mrinal Miri and Dr (Mrs.) Sujata Miri (Department of Philosophy, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong).

My wife, Saroja Sundara Rajan, has been of invaluable help and assistance to me in the present work. Apart from such help as proof correction, preparation of bibliography, notes, etc. she has helped me to clarify my thoughts and focus them more precisely and pointedly by means of her discussion and comments on almost all parts of the present work. For all this and more, I would like to record my appreciation and thanks.

 

CONTENTS

 

Part 1 Culture and Politics: Some Problems for Marxism 1
Part 2 The Analytic of Cultural Reason 48
Part 3 The Dialectic of Cultural Reason 64
Part 4 Anthropology, Philosophy and the Critique of Cultural Reason 83
  A. Transcendence and Hermeneutics 83
  B. Critique, Hermeneutics and Politics 112
  REFERENCES 133
  INDEX 137

Sample Page


Click Here for More Books Published By Indian Council of Philosophical Research

Towards a Critique of Cultural Reason

Deal 20% Off
Item Code:
IDE007
Cover:
Hardcover
Edition:
2004
ISBN:
8185636761
Language:
English
Size:
8.8" X 5.8"
Pages:
152
Other Details:
Weight of Book 313 gms
Price:
$17.00
Discounted:
$13.60   Shipping Free
You Save:
$3.40 (20%)
Look Inside the Book
Add to Wishlist
Send as e-card
Send as free online greeting card
Towards a Critique of Cultural Reason

Verify the characters on the left

From:
Edit     
You will be informed as and when your card is viewed. Please note that your card will be active in the system for 30 days.

Viewed 5025 times since 1st Sep, 2010

 

From the Jacket:

 

 

Towards A Critique of Cultural Reason, is sequel to the author's Innovative Competence and Social Change and a prelude to his The Primacy of the Political, seeks to develop a Kantian perspective on the theory of culture, based on the notion of the regulative judgement and the idea of an exemplar in Kant's Critique of Judgement. After a brief critical discussion of the Marxist view of the relation between culture and politics, the author develops a theory of discourse which he believes would enable us to understand how meanings may transcend contextuality and function as exemplars having a symbolic rather than merely a significational context. These exemplary unites of meaning, which may be called symbols of transcendence, constitute the fabric of culture, which in terms of its context-transcending role, may serve as sources of validation for similar exemplary actions. The book then moves on to a study of the inter-relationship between meaning and action. In the concluding portion the author seeks to develop some suggestions towards a hermeneutical understanding of culture and politics. As elements of the overall discussion, the book also deals with such themes as the Kantian notion of Critique, Dilthey's project of a Hermeneutics of Historical Reason, Ricoeur's perspective on speech and textual discourse and Husserl's reflections on the life-world.

 

Preface

 

The present work is a continuation, on the theoretical plane, of my earlier work Innovative Competence and Social Change (University of Pune, Poona, 1986). The earlier work had ended with the issue of a proper theoretical framework for understanding the relationship between Culture and Politics. It is precisely with this problem that the present work begins. A Accordingly, the first part, Culture and Politics: Some Problems jar Marxism raises certain serious philosophical issues regarding theory and praxis. It is suggested that we may have to distinguish three forms of this interrelationship, namely, (1) Theory of Action, (2) Theory for Action, and (3) Theory in Action. The first, ‘Theory of Action’, is the context of methodology while the second, ‘Theory for Action’, is the domain of discussions of strategy and tactics. While these two forms of interrelationship between theory and practice have been widely studied, the third, namely, ‘Theory in Action’, is a relatively neglected area of inquiry. Hence, the first part concentrates on this idea of meanings and principles (theory) as constituting practice. This idea is developed in the form of a theory of communicative practices (against the backdrop of the theory of speech acts). The essential feature of the theory is the distinction between two levels of the communicative process- signification and symbolization. Basing myself on the work of Paul Ricoeur and others in general hermeneutic theory, I distinguish signification as the expression of contextualized and situation- specific meanings, from symbolization as the ‘moment’ within the process of communication itself as the transcendence of such contextuality. Accordingly, the discussion turns upon the possibility and modes of such transcendence. Signification and Symbolization are here understood as two levels of the semiotic process and their differentiation in terms of subject, addressee and reference are worked out.

A Using the theory of symbolic transcendence suggested in the first part, the investigation takes a transcendental turn in the second part—The Analytic of Cultural Reason. The inquiry is transcendental in the sense that it asks for the grounds of possibility of a certain given phenomenon, namely, that human subjects are capable of expressing themselves at both the signific and symbolic levels. The fact that meanings are communicated at both the levels is shown to be essential for the possibility of culture and hence the transcendental inquiry, at this stage, shapes itself as a Critique of Cultural Reason, patterned after the Kantian Critical Programme. Kantian Critique, as is well known, has two major parts—the Analytic and the Dialectic.1n general the Analytic is a positive argumentation whose objective is to work out a conceptual framework within which alone the phenomenon under consideration becomes intelligible. In the present case the quaestio facti from which we start is that men are capable of expressing meanings at both the signific and symbolic levels, i.e. that men interpret themselves and their experiences in terms of culture. The questio juris, in this case, is to derive the framework of categorial principles in terms of which such cultural understandings may be made intelligible. Using the model of the critical project, we may call this the transcendental deduction of cultural reason. Of course, the project of a transcendental deduction of cultural reason in all its complexity is not attempted here rather, Part only attempts what may be called a prolegomenon to such a transcendental deduction of culture, In this prolegomenon, the theoretical framework of Kant’s own Critique of judgement is used as a point of departure. Part 2 describes two modes of transcendence of situationality, firstly at the level of meanings and secondly at the level of actions——these two modes of transcendence are cal- led respectively, exemplars of meaning and exemplars of action. The interrelationship of these two types of exemplars is studied with the hope that such an investigation may provide a Kantian framework for the discussion of culture and politics with which the project started.

Part 3, The Dialectic of Cultural Reason, continues the critical programme in so far as it works out the antinomies of culture theory in the form of Kantian dialectics. The general principles of a Kantain dialectic are formulated and then applied to the specific case of culture. Also, the previously formulated distinction between signification and symbolization is used as the framework for a consideration of the relativistic and universalistic understandings of culture. The problematic of cultural relativism is articulated within this framework and is also shown how the basic notions developed in the course of the earlier discussion, namely, exemplary meanings and exemplary comprehension, may help us to overcome the limitations of relativism. Part 3, therefore, fulfills two functions: (1) on the meta-level, it situates the debate over cultural relativism in anthropological theory within a transcendental framework, thereby serving to reconcile the antithetic claims.

The salience of critical philosophy for anthropological theory, which was the presupposition of Part 3, therefore, fulfills two functions: (1) on the meta-level, it extends the project of a Critique of Cultural Reason and (2) on the substantive level, it situates the debate over cultural relativism in anthropological theory within a transcendental framework, thereby serving to reconcile the antithetic claims.

The salience of critical philosophy for anthropological theory, which was the presupposition of Part 3, becomes the focus of attention in Part 4, Anthropology, Philosophy and Critique of Cultural Reason. 'this part has two major concerns: on the one hand, the notion of symbolic transcendence, which has been the moving principle of the hermeneutic programme of the present project, needs to be examined in the light of the philosophical understanding of transcendence. Accordingly, section l of the present part, entitled Transcendence and Hermeneutics, reviews the emergence of the Kantian programme of finite transcendence against the metaphysical theories of transcendence in Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz. If section l is concerned with the formation of Critique in the context of Pre—Kantian thought, section 2 on Critique, Hermeneutics and Politics seeks to place the critical programme in the context of the development of post-Kantian thought. Here an attempt is made to link together hermeneutics and transcendental critique in the form of a discussion of Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Husserl and Heidegger. The discussion gravitates towards Heidegger’s Kant-interpretation in the form of a fundamental ontology. But what perhaps marks off the present investigation from that of Heidegger are (i) unlike Heidegger’s Kant and the Problem of (Metaphysics, the present essay is more closely tuned to Kant’s Critique of judgement, (ii) it seeks to provide a transcendental grounding for a theory of politics. Indeed, this last theme is the concern of section 2 and thus the project comes back to its basic problematic-the understanding of the relationship between culture and politics. A number of friends, students, research scholars and colleagues have helped me greatly in ways more numerous than I can mention in the course of the present work. I wish to express my appreciation and thanks for their help and concern with my work. But there are others who have helped me more specifically during distinct stages of the present investigations. Of these, I would like to mention Dr Probal Dasgupta (Deccan College, Pune), Dr Ashok Kelkar (Deccan College, Pune), Professor Ram Bapat (Department of Politics, University of Poona, Pune), Dr Dharmendra Goel and Dr (Miss) Bhuvan Chandel (Department of Philosophy, Panjab University, Chandigarh) and finally Professor Mrinal Miri and Dr (Mrs.) Sujata Miri (Department of Philosophy, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong).

My wife, Saroja Sundara Rajan, has been of invaluable help and assistance to me in the present work. Apart from such help as proof correction, preparation of bibliography, notes, etc. she has helped me to clarify my thoughts and focus them more precisely and pointedly by means of her discussion and comments on almost all parts of the present work. For all this and more, I would like to record my appreciation and thanks.

 

CONTENTS

 

Part 1 Culture and Politics: Some Problems for Marxism 1
Part 2 The Analytic of Cultural Reason 48
Part 3 The Dialectic of Cultural Reason 64
Part 4 Anthropology, Philosophy and the Critique of Cultural Reason 83
  A. Transcendence and Hermeneutics 83
  B. Critique, Hermeneutics and Politics 112
  REFERENCES 133
  INDEX 137

Sample Page


Click Here for More Books Published By Indian Council of Philosophical Research

Post a Comment
 
Post Review
Post a Query
For privacy concerns, please view our Privacy Policy
Based on your browsing history
Loading... Please wait

Items Related to Towards a Critique of Cultural Reason (Philosophy | Books)

Philosophy in Classical India (The Proper work of Reason)
Item Code: IHL523
$25.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Tibetan Buddhism Reason and Revelation
Item Code: NAJ817
$28.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Glimpses Of Indian Culture: Ancient And Modern
Item Code: NAD911
$30.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
History of Mental Illness: A Cultural Psychiatry Retrospective
Deal 20% Off
Item Code: IHJ009
$75.00$60.00
You save: $15.00 (20%)
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Becoming Buddha: Wisdom Culture for a Meaningful Life (Teachings of the Venerable Lamas)
Deal 20% Off
by Renuka Singh
Hardcover (Edition: 2011)
Penguin Books, New Delhi
Item Code: NAC737
$30.00$24.00
You save: $6.00 (20%)
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Gender and Cultural Identity in Colonial Orissa
by Sachidananda mohanty
Paperback (Edition: 2008)
Orient Longman Pvt. Ltd.
Item Code: NAG082
$25.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Prophets Facing Backward (Postmodernism, Science and Hindu Nationalism)
by Meera Nanda
Paperback (Edition: 2011)
Permanent Black
Item Code: NAI022
$25.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Feminism Without Borders (Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity)
by Chandra Talpade Mohanty
Hardcover (Edition: 2006)
Zubaan Publications
Item Code: NAF883
$40.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Testimonials
I have always been delighted with your excellent service and variety of items.
James, USA
I've been happy with prior purchases from this site!
Priya, USA
Thank you. You are providing an excellent and unique service.
Thiru, UK
Thank You very much for this wonderful opportunity for helping people to acquire the spiritual treasures of Hinduism at such an affordable price.
Ramakrishna, Australia
I really LOVE you! Wonderful selections, prices and service. Thank you!
Tina, USA
This is to inform you that the shipment of my order has arrived in perfect condition. The actual shipment took only less than two weeks, which is quite good seen the circumstances. I waited with my response until now since the Buddha statue was a present that I handed over just recently. The Medicine Buddha was meant for a lady who is active in the healing business and the statue was just the right thing for her. I downloaded the respective mantras and chants so that she can work with the benefits of the spiritual meanings of the statue and the mantras. She is really delighted and immediately fell in love with the beautiful statue. I am most grateful to you for having provided this wonderful work of art. We both have a strong relationship with Buddhism and know to appreciate the valuable spiritual power of this way of thinking. So thank you very much again and I am sure that I will come back again.
Bernd, Spain
You have the best selection of Hindu religous art and books and excellent service.i AM THANKFUL FOR BOTH.
Michael, USA
I am very happy with your service, and have now added a web page recommending you for those interested in Vedic astrology books: https://www.learnastrologyfree.com/vedicbooks.htm Many blessings to you.
Hank, USA
As usual I love your merchandise!!!
Anthea, USA
You have a fine selection of books on Hindu and Buddhist philosophy.
Walter, USA
Language:
Currency:
All rights reserved. Copyright 2019 © Exotic India